19. Metrics That Actually Matter
Measure prevented harm and legitimate-user burden across the whole decision system.
Reader outcome
Build a scorecard spanning harm, errors, friction, latency, recurrence, support, infrastructure, economics, and adaptation.
Candidate measures
Prevented harm, false-positive cost, appeal overturn, attacker replacement cost, legitimate-user friction, time to detection, time to intervention, recurrence, displacement, support burden, and defense cost.
Decision questions
- What counterfactual establishes “prevented” harm?
- Which metric becomes a target attackers or teams can game?
- How are uncertainty and delayed outcomes represented?
- Can aggregate success hide concentrated harm to a user group?
Evidence needed
- Causal evaluation and experimentation methods
- Metric gaming and feedback-loop cases
- Trust-and-safety or fraud scorecards
- Longitudinal displacement measurement